Finding Product Market Fit in SaaS

There are a million articles about this, yes I know. But how many of them include detailed research from leading companies that you likely use every day? Every startup founder dreams of reaching product-market fit - that magic moment when their solution resonates with a large market and growth takes off. But how do you get there? Validating your initial idea, iterating based on feedback, and analyzing early traction are key steps in the journey. This can be a difficult topic to grasp, especially since there are so many examples of companies that have done things slightly differently than the "book" says to, so l wanted to explore startup examples like WhatsApp, Slack, Instagram and more to illustrate frameworks and lessons learned around achieving product-market fit.

Idea Generation and Assumption Testing

Coming up with a strong, viable product idea is one of the most important first steps when starting a new tech venture. However, this process can often be confusing and fraught with untested assumptions. How do you ensure your idea is rooted in real market demand and not just your own internal biases?

There are two main approaches to generating and validating new ideas – inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning involves looking at large amounts of existing data from sources like market research surveys, competitive analyses, focus groups, and more. The goal is to identify gaps, trends, or opportunities in a market based on aggregated data signals. This inductive approach relies on processing a significant amount of information to derive insights into problems worth solving or needs worth addressing. The starting point is external data rather than novel concepts.

Some downsides of solely using inductive reasoning are that it can be incredibly time and resource intensive to aggregate all of the required data, especially for early-stage startups with limited means. Additionally, it tends to extract what is already “out there” about a market rather than uncovering brand new ideas or concepts that are revolutionary. Large enterprises and organizations with extensive budgets and dedicated research teams are often best equipped for comprehensively pursuing inductive reasoning and synthesis to drive idea generation.

Deductive reasoning relies more on intimate team brainstorming sessions, design sprints, and rapid experiments or prototypes to come up with completely novel ideas for products and services. This creative deductive approach attempts to generate original concepts that may not have been thought of previously or addressed by existing market research. The methodologies are diverse – from experiential team building exercises to hands-on experiments and prototypes. The point is to maximize sources of innovation by getting into a creative headspace where entirely new solutions can emerge, often by deeply integrating customer and user perspectives into the ideation process from the beginning.

This deductive approach is very attractive for early-stage startups, as the constraints around resources, budgets, and access to extensive data availability are less likely to restrict or slow down the ideation process. With deductive reasoning, a founding team can potentially come up with powerful new concepts and ideas through intentional creativity and a clean slate approach. However, the risk here is that deductive brainstorming in a vacuum yields ideas for products that may not fully align with broader customer needs or market demand once they are actually built and launched. Testing and validating the underlying assumptions behind new ideas generated deductively is critical.

As referenced in our “Product Development Phases” guide, those early customer conversations and interviews can be extremely valuable for identifying problems customers face and the outcomes they desire when using a product. But this qualitative feedback is certainly less accurate and reliable for assessing how well specific solutions, features, and products will actually meet those needs once they are built. Customers may express interest or excitement in a new idea that ultimately does not perfectly align with their actual behaviors, pain points, and jobs-to-be-done when presented with the finished product.

Therefore, when initially generating raw ideas for products, founders and entrepreneurs should consider leveraging both inductive and deductive approaches to achieve balance. Conducting some level of broader market research using surveys, competitive analysis, focus groups, and more can help complement intensive creative brainstorming sessions focused on identifying those original concepts and underserved needs.

WhatsApp provides a useful example of a company that leveraged both inductive and deductive reasoning in the early stages. The founders set out to identify a need or desire for simple, seamless messaging that avoided the complexity and ads found in most other messaging apps at the time. They arrived at this initial idea deductively through creative brainstorming grounded in their own experiences. However, they then validated this qualitative hypothesis through inductive research – gathering feedback from early prototype testers and small focus groups to confirm broad interest in such a streamlined messaging application. The final validation came through quantitative usage and growth data at scale, proving massive market demand for the type of messaging app they had envisioned.

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Validation

Once a startup has an initial product idea or concept, whether it was derived deductively, inductively, or using both approaches, validating that it truly solves a real customer problem and aligns with market demand is absolutely critical. Getting clear signals and feedback from potential users and customers in the early stages helps founders refine, pivot, or abandon concepts before over-investing significant time and resources into building the wrong product.

As outlined in a “Product-Market Fit” guide (one of many, many guides out there), there are several effective strategies and metrics entrepreneurs can leverage to test their core assumptions during the pre-launch phase:

• Release an MVP or prototype to engage early adopters and collect direct user feedback on the potential product’s features, UX, desirability, and ability to solve pains. As noted in our related “Minimum Viable Product” article, leveraging qualitative user input from those early adopters who closely match your target customer profile is a smart validation technique.
• Create landing pages with pricing and purchase options to quantify demand and measure conversion rates, as well as real willingness to pay. This can be a way to gather tangible data regarding interest without needing to fully build out the operational product. However, be aware that claimed interest and theoretical purchase intent does not always translate perfectly to actual commerce behavior.
• Conduct surveys with prospective users asking key questions about their reaction if the product did not exist or was no longer available. Sean Ellis, CEO of GrowthHackers, found that startups which have over 40% of survey respondents state they would be “very disappointed” without the product in their lives have a great chance of sustainable, scalable growth. Surveys can complement real-world testing.
• Monitor organic traction and usage once an MVP is launched and accessible - are users actually signing up, engaging with core product features, and retaining without much paid acquisition spend? Strong traction and usage with minimal marketing indicates genuine product-market fit.
• Leverage Net Promoter Score (NPS) surveys to measure early user satisfaction and loyalty. Products that drive high NPS scores are effectively solving real pains.

Similarly, I came across a “Top Startup Mistakes” article (one which I could add probably 100+ mistakes too from my own personal experiences), ~42% of startups fail because they do not effectively test assumptions about target customer needs before dedicating huge resources to building out features or scale. Testing prospective user demand and desire for the product concept early on is critical to avoiding this pitfall. The key insight is that qualitative feedback provides helpful context while quantitative data confirms actual demand. In the early days of Slack, founder Stewart Butterfield obtained qualitative insights about team communication pain points and desires through interviews and usability tests for their initial gaming app Glitch. However, the more reliable indicator of Slack’s fit came through analyzing hard conversion, activation, and retention data after building the MVP for their team communication pivot.

This combination of both qualitative and quantitative insight guided the evolution of Instagram as well. Early observations and market research revealed the overall consumer trend of sharing photos online. But the company’s explosive growth relied on usage and retention data showing that their specific solution to this desire – a streamlined photo sharing app with filters – had struck a chord with users based on how much time they actively spent in the application.

Minimum Viable Product (MVP)

Rather than over-engineering a complex product before proving out demand, start by building a minimum viable product (MVP) to validate interest in the core idea or technology with real users. This MVP strips down the product to the bare minimum set of essential features that can support user testing and feedback. For example, Tinder’s breakthrough MVP innovation was their radically simple card swiping mechanism for considering potential matches. This addressed the core value proposition of Tinder as a mobile-first and intuitive way to engage in online dating. Instagram also initially gained traction with an incredibly simple MVP that removed distracting features and focused solely on the photo filters and network sharing experience.

In their earliest days, WhatsApp first tested demand for their vision of an ad-free messaging application by building a simple MVP app focused on status updates and availability. Dropbox began with a basic drag-and-drop file storage MVP to validate their cloud storage utility before prioritizing additional collaboration features.

Obsessively Solving the Target Customer’s Core Job-to-be-Done

In addition to testing an MVP, startups should obsessively focus on deeply understanding and addressing the core “job-to-be-done” that target users are seeking to accomplish. Often founders discover through user feedback that they have significant product-market fit but only after pivoting or evolving the product offering to align with the job customers were actually trying to get done, rather than their original assumptions.

In looking at popular tools/well known companies, Slack realized over time through growth analysis and feedback that the core job their users sought to achieve was smoother team communication and collaboration. While their initial product concept Glitch focused on gaming socialization, the pivot to a generalized communication platform directly aligned this solution with the actual job-to-be-done. Instagram also famously pivoted from their initial MVP called Burbn, which offered an array of features from restaurant reviews and reservations to location check-ins similar to Foursquare. But user feedback revealed that enabling self-expression through simple photo sharing was the deeper underlying job and desire. Focusing single-mindedly on this job-to-be done propelled Instagram’s exponential adoption and growth.

Listen to User Feedback and Improve the Product Offering

To achieve product-market fit over time, founders should leverage early adopters and customers to drive an ongoing feedback loop that informs product iterations, expansions, and improvements.

For example, WhatsApp built group chat functionality, support for voice messages, and other features based directly on user input and feedback on ways to enhance the messaging experience. Slack incorporated third-party integrations and bots based on requests and use cases from early customers. Dropbox’s first enterprise customers wanted abilities to securely share files and folders for internal collaboration. By truly listening and responding to this feedback, Dropbox evolved the product experience to solve more varied jobs-to-be-done beyond just cloud backup and storage. Instagram has added features like Stories and IGTV over time to satisfy user demands for self-expression beyond just static photo sharing.

Analyze Both Qualitative and Quantitative Data for Insights

To drive ongoing product optimization, founders NEED to analyze both direct qualitative feedback from users as well as quantitative traction and usage data. I can't tell you how many people I have met that are buildinug things with no analytics (or worse, thinking that they have analytics "checked off" but in reality they just threw Google Analytics in).

I did some research on companies doing this, which was hard because I obviously don't have internal access to all of their operations. But I did find a few. InvestCloud gathers qualitative insights from initial customer conversations and client communications to improve and enhance their core digital platform for financial advisors. But they also rigorously evaluate quantitative product usage data, analyzing feature adoption across the full stack of InvestCloud modules to guide business model evolution. Zumper continues to gather both types of data to refine their end-to-end rental experience product offering. They conduct user interviews and extensive market research to obtain qualitative insights into renter and landlord needs. However, they also leverage behavioral data from user search patterns and transactions to derive data-driven insights that fine-tune the digital rental experience.

Evolve the Solution as the Market Changes While Retaining Core Focus

As the competitive landscape and customer expectations evolve over time, continue refining and expanding the product offering to create stickiness while still retaining ruthless focus on solving the core job-to-be-done. Tinder has evolved from its original MVP to incorporate enhancements like an improved matching algorithm, expanded discovery options, and premium features like Super Likes in response to changing user preferences. But the core swipe-based matching experience still addresses the same essential jobs of intuitive dating and social connections. WhatsApp and Slack have also continued enhancing functionality by incorporating new technologies and features like voice messaging, video chat, file sharing, and third-party integrations over time in order to improve and modernize the communication experience. But the fundamental emphasis on simplicity and seamless communication remains tied to their original value proposition.

And while the specific product features and business model will evolve over time, maintaining consistency in the founder’s core vision is imperative during scaling. InvestCloud originally started by offering tailored financial communication solutions and office productivity tools for enterprises in the space. Over time, they expanded into a full-stack digital platform delivering everything from front-end advisor interfaces to back-end cloud support and asset management solutions. But the founders' core vision of empowering innovation in the financial services ecosystem by accelerating digital transformation remained consistent throughout InvestCloud’s growth. This clarity of vision continued aligning product enhancements with the company’s true north.

Opendoor provides another example of retaining focus on the founder’s vision while expanding the product offering. Initially, Opendoor developed a mobile app to enable homeowners to sell in a few simple taps, with the company purchasing the home directly. However, over time, Opendoor has evolved into a complete “one-stop shop” for transactions by incorporating adjacent services like title and escrow, mortgages, warranties, and more. But their core vision of simplifying the end-to-end real estate journey by integrating the fragmented steps has remained consistent despite the wider product suite. The expanded products ladder up to the same overarching vision.

Measuring Product Traction & Feedback as Indicators

In addition to soliciting direct customer feedback, constantly analyzing product traction and usage data provides quantitative validation that a product is delivering true value. For products that have achieved a solid product-market fit, metrics around visitor-to-signup conversion rates, user activation frequencies, retention and churn, and referral rates will indicate sustainable stickiness. WhatsApp was seeing global user traction in the millions within just a couple years of launch. Tinder was organically adopted on over 500 college campuses within one year of launch based on word-of-mouth viral sharing. This type of exponential “hockey stick growth” points clearly to genuine product-market fit where the product has become seamlessly woven into users’ daily lives.

Well-crafted user surveys and NPS scores are another way to quantify product-market fit, especially when combined with usage data signals. Given the incredible organic growth WhatsApp saw across both consumer and enterprise users, it is highly likely their NPS score and results from Sean Ellis’ survey asking “How disappointed would you be if you could no longer use this product?” were extremely high. Tinder’s early exponential adoption on university campuses without any paid marketing also indicates they had successfully built a product that solved the collegiate use case job-to-be-done of social discovery and dating. Surveys can confirm this resonance.

Achieve Monetization Fit Alongside Product-Market Fit

Products should test real pricing and willingness to pay from their earliest stages rather than solely relying on free trials and freemium models long-term.

Both Dropbox and WhatsApp built paid subscription models into their initial product launches to validate that users saw enough value in the solution to regularly pay for access.

WhatsApp’s initial beta program charged a very nominal yearly subscription fee, which they later increased once the broader utility was proven with growth. But charging from day one provided that early quantitative signal regarding willingness to pay.

Startups must solve the equation for monetization alongside achieving core product-market fit to prove out their business model. Instagram had already developed massive, engaged user traction around its photo-sharing product before introducing advertising. This indicated that the integration of ads would likely align seamlessly with user behavior. WhatsApp and Slack also matched their eventual monetization models to the nature of their viral products. Subscriptions were aligned for WhatsApp given the high product usage and retention. Slack’s freemium model took advantage of network effects to spur organic adoption.

Yes, long-winded (but also a compilation of research so, I'm not mad about it). Key takeaways for achieving genuine product-market fit? I would say:

• Validate your initial idea through quick prototypes, feedback loops, and usage data analysis.
• Maintain a bold consistency of vision while evolving the product offering over time as the market changes.
• Leverage both qualitative user feedback and quantitative traction analytics in tandem to drive ongoing optimization.
• Achieve monetization fit in line with the core product experience.
• Know when you’ve found fit based on exponential organic growth and usage.

The journey to product-market fit requires rigorously testing assumptions, experimenting with solutions, and truly internalizing user needs. But services like WhatsApp, Slack, Instagram, and Tinder prove that builders who stay focused on solving real customer problems have the potential to achieve stratospheric growth. While elusive, product-market fit is often hidden just one iteration away. Get yourself an expert, even as an advisor if you can't afford to hire one full-time.

‍